USER FORUM
(you are viewing a thread; or go back to list of threads)
neosolve new fork of solvespace (by dadoprom)
it was published on reddit...
neosolve is an enhanced fork of SolveSpace, the parametric 2D/3D CAD tool. It integrates OpenCASCADE for modern solid modeling operations while preserving SolveSpace's lightweight, constraint-based workflow.
https://github.com/0xSeren/neosolve
it looks good, but it crashes a lot at the moment
neosolve is an enhanced fork of SolveSpace, the parametric 2D/3D CAD tool. It integrates OpenCASCADE for modern solid modeling operations while preserving SolveSpace's lightweight, constraint-based workflow.
https://github.com/0xSeren/neosolve
it looks good, but it crashes a lot at the moment
alalala (by xerio123)
OpenCASCADE is not usable that the problem.
if you make a linear repetition more than 200 copy OpenCASCADE become too slow. (more than 2s for 300 extrude square one my computer)
this lib is useless.
if you make a linear repetition more than 200 copy OpenCASCADE become too slow. (more than 2s for 300 extrude square one my computer)
this lib is useless.
But (by Xerio123)
But sorry for thé bas comment. You made a great job.
Not fully cooked (by Ali)
What I tried is a making a simple rectangle then apply a horizontal symmetric constraint. This action would make the existing horizontal line constraint redundant. The normal SolveSpace program understands and accepts when I delete the redundant horizontal line constraint. However, this new program still thinks the constraints are redundant even after deleting.
While I appreciate the effort it can take to change the engine/kernel, I cannot accept a regression on such a basic operation.
While I appreciate the effort it can take to change the engine/kernel, I cannot accept a regression on such a basic operation.
Post a reply to this comment: